Effects of manual therapy in addition to stretching and strengthening exercises to improve scapular range of motion, functional capacity and pain in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The current study aimed to measure the effectiveness of manual therapy in addition to stretching and strengthening exercises in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome to improve functional capacity, pain, and scapular range of motion. METHODS: This is a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Thirty-two participants with chronic shoulder impingement syndrome were randomly allocated into two groups. Both groups received stretching and strengthening exercises while the treatment group was given manual therapy additionally. Treatment was started after the patients signed an informed consent form. The data were collected from the University of Lahore Teaching Hospital between March 2022 and December 2022. The study aimed to measure pain using a numeric pain rating scale, functional capacity was assessed by the disability of the arm and shoulder, and goniometry was used for scapular ranges, i.e., scapular protraction and upward rotation. Each treatment session lasted 45 min for the treatment group and 30 min for the control group. The treatment comprised five days a week for four weeks, after which post-intervention measurements were taken. RESULTS: Thirty-two participants were enrolled in the study, and 16 were divided into each group. The mean age of the participants in the treatment group was 38.19 ± 7.31 while the comparison group was 35.69 ± 7.98. An independent sample t-test was run on the data with a 95% confidence interval, statistically significant results were obtained, i.e., p-value < 0.05, post-intervention in the treatment group. Both groups have significantly improved functional capacity and scapular protraction (p < 0.005), however, pain and scapular upward rotation were not found statistically significant in the control group (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The addition of manual therapy along with exercise therapy showed clinical and statistical significant results for pain, functional capacity, and scapular range of motion. It demonstrated superior effects than exercise therapy alone for the chronic condition of SIS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials ( https://www.irct.ir/ ) with the registration number: IRCT20230526058291N1, (Date: 12/08/2023).

Utilizing Scapula Retraction Exercises With or Without Glenohumeral Rotational Exercises With a Gradual Progression for Subacromial Pain Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Although exercise interventions are recommended in the management of subacromial pain syndrome (SPS), there is a lack of data regarding the exercises focusing on the principal biomechanical deficiencies that cause symptoms. HYPOTHESIS: Utilizing progressive scapula retraction exercises (SRE) and glenohumeral rotation exercises (GRE) in the scapula stabilization program may lead to more reduction in symptoms and greater acromiohumeral distance (AHD) values. STUDY DESIGN: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2. METHODS: A total of 33 patients were assigned randomly to either SRE or SRE+GRE. Both groups received a 12-week supervised rehabilitation program, including manual therapy and exercises (stretching and progressive scapula stabilization exercises). In addition, the SRE+GRE group performed GRE exercises at gradual elevation angles. From 12 to 24 weeks, patients performed exercise programs less frequently (3 times per week). Disability (shoulder pain and disability index [SPADI]), AHD (at 5 active abduction angles), pain intensity (visual analogue scale [VAS]), and patient satisfaction were recorded at baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks. A total of 16 healthy individuals were recruited as a control group to compare AHD values. Data were analyzed using mixed model analyses of variance. RESULTS: A statistically significant group-by-time interaction was found for AHD values (F4,92 = 6.38; P = 0.001), a significant group-by-time interaction for SPADI-disability (F1,33 = 5.148; P = 0.01), SPADI-total (F1,32 = 4.172; P = 0.03), and for pain during activity (F2,62 = 3.204; P = 0.05). However, no significant group-by-time interaction for SPADI-pain (F1,33 = 0.533; P = 0.48), for pain at rest (F1,31 < 0.001; P = 0.99), and at night (F1,32 = 2.166; P = 0.15). Yet, a significant time effect was observed. CONCLUSION: Progressive SRE and GRE in the scapula stabilization program lessens symptoms and improves AHD values in patients with SPS. Moreover, this program could preserve outcomes and further increase AHD when applied less frequently. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Utilizing SRE and GRE in the scapula stabilization program at gradual shoulder abduction angles provides better rehabilitation outcomes.

Comparison of Manual Therapy Technique to Therapeutic Exercise in the Treatment of Patients With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of manual therapy to therapeutic exercise on shoulder pain, disability, and range of motion (ROM) in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SAIS). METHODS: Sixty patients with SAIS were randomly assigned into the manual therapy (MT) and therapeutic exercise (TE) groups. Patients in the MT group were treated with joint mobilization, which was applied to the glenohumeral, acromioclavicular, sternoclavicular and scapulothoracic joints, and trigger point (TrP) inactivation using ischemic compression. Patients in the TE group performed therapeutic exercises. Shoulder pain, disability and active ROM (elevation, external rotation, and internal rotation) were assessed by the visual analog scale, the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, and a goniometer, respectively. The outcomes were measured at baseline, after the intervention, and 1 month after the intervention. RESULTS: After the treatment, both groups had significant improvements in shoulder pain, disability, and ROM (P < .05). The MT group experienced a greater reduction in shoulder pain than the TE group (P < .001). However, in disability and ROM, both groups exhibited similar improvements in post-treatment and follow-up periods. CONCLUSION: Both MT and TE were effective in improving shoulder pain, disability, and ROM in patients with SAIS. Greater improvement in shoulder pain was observed in the MT group.

[Subacromial shoulder impingement]. / Subakromiales Schulterimpingement.

Impingement, especially subacromial impingement, is one of the most frequent causes of shoulder pain. It results in soft tissue pathologies due to constriction of the subacromial space. It can lead to tendon pathologies and bursitis. In addition to the clinical examination, imaging methods such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), MRI arthrography, ultrasound and X­ray examinations are helpful in making a diagnosis or evaluating the cause of pain. Conservative treatment approaches, such as rest, medication, physiotherapy, manual therapy and infiltrations should primarily be used. If the symptoms do not improve after 3-6 months of conservative treatment, surgical treatment should be considered.

Physical and well-being effect of scapular kinesio taping combined with conventional physiotherapy in shoulder impingement syndrome: A randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Kinesio taping (KT) is one of the treatment methods used on patients with shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS). There are different results regarding its effectiveness in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of scapular KT combined with a conventional physiotherapy program on scapular dyskinesia, shoulder pain, upper extremity function, and well-being in patients with SIS. METHODS: The study was conducted with 60 outpatients diagnosed with SIS, aged 40-65 years. The patients were divided into two groups: KT [conventional physiotherapy program + scapular KT (targets scapular retraction and is applied along the inferior-medial edge of the scapula, starting from the processus coracoids), n= 30] and control [conventional physiotherapy program, n= 30]. In before- and after-treatment evaluations, the Lateral Scapular Slide Test (LSST) for scapular dyskinesia, a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for shoulder pain, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) for upper extremity function were used. In addition, at the end of treatment, a Kinesio taping Satisfaction Survey, created by the researchers, was filled out by the KT group for the assessment of well-being. RESULTS: The interaction effect of Group*Time was not statistically significant in all outcome measures (p> 0.05). However, the main effect of both group and time was statistically significant in the DASH-Function/Symptom, VAS-Rest, VAS-Activity, and VAS-Night (p< 0.05). Moreover, only the main effect of time was statistically significant in LSST-1 and LSST-3 (p< 0.05). In the KT group, the satisfaction level was 8.50 ± 1.69 and the recommendation level was 8.72 ± 1.81. CONCLUSION: Both conventional physiotherapy programs and additional scapular KT improved scapular dyskinesia, reduced pain, and increased the upper extremity function. Adding scapular KT to treatment did not change the results, but it had positive psychological effects and yielded a high satisfaction rate.

Comparison of corticosteroid injection, physiotherapy and combined treatment for patients with chronic subacromial bursitis - A randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether combination of corticosteroid subdeltoid injections and physiotherapy was more effective than either treatment alone in chronic subacromial bursitis. DESIGN: Prospective, three-arm randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Rehabilitation department of an academic hospital. SUBJECTS: Patients with chronic subacromial bursitis. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were divided into corticosteroid injection (N = 36), physiotherapy (N = 40) and combined (N = 35) groups. Two corticosteroid subdeltoid injections in corticosteroid group, 8-week physical therapy emphasising on therapeutic exercise in physiotherapy group, and combined both treatments in combined group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were pain visual analogue scale and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index at 8 weeks after finishing treatment. The secondary outcome measures were active range of motion, Shoulder Disability Questionnaire, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index, patient's evaluation of treatment effect, and symptom recurrence. RESULTS: Group comparison showed significant statistical difference in shoulder flexion (P < 0.003) and patient's evaluation of treatment effect (P < 0.001). The time and group interactions comparison revealed significant statistical differences in pain score (P < 0.024), external rotation (P < 0.044) and patient's evaluation of treatment effect (P < 0.001). The above statistics were in favour of the corticosteroid and combined groups rather than physiotherapy group. The percentage of recurrence was 36.1, 7.5 and 17.1 in the corticosteroid, physiotherapy and combined groups, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Corticosteroid subdeltoid injection, or combined with physiotherapy, was superior to physiotherapy alone, but the recurrence rate was least in the physiotherapy group.

Effectiveness of scapular mobilization in people with subacromial impingement syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Scapular mobilization is a manual therapy technique widely used in the management of musculoskeletal disorders of the shoulder. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of scapular mobilization in addition to an exercise program in people with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS). METHODS: Seventy-two adults with SIS were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups. The control group (n=36) participated in a 6-week exercise program, and the intervention group (n = 36) participated in the same exercise program plus passive manual scapular mobilization. Both groups were assessed at baseline and 6 weeks (end of treatment). The primary outcome measure was upper limb function assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Secondary outcome measures were the Constant-Murley questionnaire, pain (visual analog scale [VAS]), and scapular upward rotation. RESULTS: All participants completed the trial. The between-group difference in DASH was -1.1 points (Cohen d = 0.05; p = 0.911), Constant-Murley 2.1 points (Cohen d = 0.08; p = 0.841), VAS rating of pain at rest -0.1 cm (Cohen d = 0.05; p = 0.684), and VAS rating of pain during movement -0.2 cm (Cohen d = 0.09; p = 0.764); scapular upward rotation at rest (arm by the side) was 0.6° (Cohen d = 0.09; p = 0.237), at 45° shoulder abduction was 0.8° (Cohen d = 0.13; p = 0.096), at 90° was 0.1° (Cohen d = 0.04; p = 0.783), and at 135° was 0.1° (Cohen d = 0.07; p = 0.886). Most differences were in favor of the intervention group; however, the effect sizes were weak and not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In the short-term, the addition of scapular mobilization did not provide significant clinical benefits in terms of function, pain or scapular motion in participants with SIS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Brazilian registry of clinical trials UTN number U1111-1226-2081. Registered February 25, 2019.

Shoulder Impingement Syndrome.

Shoulder impingement is the most common diagnosis for shoulder pain. Shoulder impingement syndrome has been scrutinized as a misleading "umbrella" term, due to its vague and nonspecific context. It is better subcategorized into subacromial, internal, and subcoracoid impingement. The evaluation and treatment algorithm for each is grossly similar. A thorough history, focused physical examination, and standard radiographs are the first steps. Advanced imaging with MRI or ultrasound may be useful. The mainstay of treatment includes physical therapy, anti-inflammatory medications, and injections. Surgical treatment is reserved for refractory cases, and includes decompression, debridement, and/or repair of injured structures.

Level of pain catastrophising determines if patients with long-standing subacromial impingement benefit from more resistance exercise: predefined secondary analyses from a pragmatic randomised controlled trial (the SExSI Trial).

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim was to investigate the effectiveness of adding more resistance exercise to usual care on pain mechanisms (including temporal summation, conditioned pain modulation (CPM) and local pain sensitivity) and pain catastrophising in people with subacromial impingement at 16 weeks follow-up. Second, to investigate the modifying effect of pain mechanisms and pain catastrophising on the interventions' effectiveness in improving shoulder strength and disability METHODS: 200 consecutive patients were randomly allocated to usual exercise-based care or the same plus additional elastic band exercise to increase total exercise dose. Completed add-on exercise dose was captured using an elastic band sensor. Outcome measures recorded at baseline, 5 weeks, 10 weeks and 16 (primary end point) weeks included temporal summation of pain (TSP) and CPM assessed at the lower leg, pressure pain threshold at the deltoid muscle (PPT-deltoid), pain catastrophising and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. RESULTS: Additional elastic band exercise was not superior to usual exercise-based care in improving pain mechanisms (TSP, CPM and PPT-deltoid) or pain catastrophising after 16 weeks. Interaction analyses showed that pain catastrophising (median split) modified the effectiveness of additional exercises (effect size 14 points, 95% CI 2 to 25), with superior results in the additional exercise group compared with the usual care group in patients with less pain catastrophising. CONCLUSION: Additional resistance exercise added to usual care was not superior to usual care alone in improving pain mechanisms or pain catastrophising. Additional exercise was, however, superior in improving self-reported disability in patients with lower levels of pain catastrophising at baseline. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02747251.

Effects of thoracic spinal thrust manipulation for the management of shoulder impingement syndrome: Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of thoracic spinal thrust manipulation for shoulder impingement syndrome in the improvement of pain, range of motion and functional outcomes. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted by 2 researchers independently using search strategy developed for different databases, including Cochrane Central register of control trials, PubMed, Pedro and MEDLINE, for relevant articles published between 2008 and 2020. The search strategy was designed for each database by combining the key terms and Boolean operators related to the review's objective. RESULTS: Of the 312 studies identified, 14(4.5%) were included. Of them, 4(28.6%) were in favour of thoracic thrust manipulation, 8(57.2%) did not support thoracic thrust manipulation as the sole treatment and 2(14.3%) favoured thoracic thrust manipulation along with exercises. CONCLUSIONS: Studies indicated immediate improvement in range of motion as well as pain after thrust manipulation, but others reported no such clinical difference. Manipulation should be combined with other exercise therapy to ensure some clinical improvement.

Scapular movement training is not superior to standardized exercises in the treatment of individuals with chronic shoulder pain and scapular dyskinesis: randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether scapular movement training (SMT) is superior to standardized exercises in improving scapular biomechanics, behavioral, and clinical aspects of individuals with shoulder pain. METHODS AND METHODS: A total of 64 individuals with chronic shoulder pain were randomly assigned to receive 16 sessions of SMT or SE over 8 weeks. Outcome measures included three-dimensional scapular kinematics, muscle activity of scapulothoracic muscles, pain, disability, fear-avoidance, kinesiophobia, and self-perceived changes. Kinematics and muscle activity were assessed at baseline and after treatment, and self-reported measurements at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. RESULTS: SMT significantly (p < 0.05) decreased scapular internal rotation during arm elevation and lowering at sagittal and scapular planes (mean difference [MD]: ranged from 2.8 to 4.1°), and at lower angles of arm elevation and lowering at the frontal plane (MD: 3.4° and 2.4°, respectively), increased upper trapezius (UT) activity (MD: 10.3%) and decreased middle trapezius (MT) (MD: 60.4%) and serratus anterior (MD: 9.9%) activity during arm lowering compared to SE. Both groups significantly improved pain, disability, fear-avoidance, kinesiophobia, and self-perceived changes over 4 weeks, which was sustained over the remaining 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: SMT is not superior to standardized exercises in improving scapular biomechanics, behavioral, and clinical aspects of individuals with shoulder pain. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03528499Implications for rehabilitationScapular movement training (SMT) showed small and likely not clinically relevant changes in scapular kinematics and muscle activity compared to standardized exercises.SMT and standardized exercises presented similar improvements in pain, disability, fear-avoidance beliefs, kinesiophobia, and self-perceived change in health condition immediately following 4-weeks of treatment, which was sustained over the following 8 weeks.The changes in patient-reported outcome measures are unlikely to be associated with changes in scapular kinematics and electromyographic activity.Clinicians should consider other factors than scapular movement during the treatment of patients with shoulder pain.

The Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Patients With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to compare the effects of exercise training plus neuromuscular electrical stimulation with exercise training alone on shoulder function, pain, range of motion, and muscle strength in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. DESIGN: Patients were randomly divided into groups of exercise training ( n = 24) and exercise training + neuromuscular electrical stimulation ( n = 24). Shoulder function was evaluated with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire, pain level was assessed with a visual analog scale, range of motion was measured with a goniometer, and muscle strength was assessed with a handheld dynamometer baseline and at the end of treatment (week 8). RESULTS: In both groups, shoulder function, range of motion, and muscle strength (except flexion muscle strength in the exercise training group) increased, while pain decreased ( P < 0.05). Compared with the exercise training group, visual analog scale-activity and visual analog scale-night decreased more, and external-rotation range of motion and whole muscle strength increased more in the exercise training + neuromuscular electrical stimulation group ( P < 0.05). On the other hand, the effect sizes were medium to large for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of neuromuscular electrical stimulation treatment to exercise training did not improve shoulder function, which is the primary outcome, more than exercise training alone, but increased muscle strength and range of motion (external-rotation only) and decreased pain (activity-night), which are the secondary outcomes.

[Analysis of the effectiveness of various methods of rehabilitation of patients with subacromial impingement syndrome]. / Analiz effektivnosti primeneniya razlichnykh metodov reabilitatsii patsientov s subakromial'nym impindzhment-sindromom.

INTRODUCTION: Subacromial impingement syndrome is a common pathology that leads to a persistent decrease in the functioning of the affected limb and, as a consequence, a decrease in the quality of life and work ability of patients. According to various authors, the study of the effectiveness of treatment and rehabilitation of this pathology is quite widely presented in the literature: surgical, including arthroscopic operations, rehabilitation using various factors of physical therapy, manual and other practices. However, the issue of assessing the effectiveness of movement therapy, both alone and in combination with other therapeutic methods, remains relevant. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic gymnastics procedures, both monotherapy and in combination with manual massage according to the therapeutic method and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome of the shoulder, in order to reduce pain and improve the function of the shoulder joint. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 70 patients whose age was 42.18±10.42 years. Patients were divided into two main groups: group 1 (n=34) and group 2 (n=36). All patients received a course of treatment, including 10 procedures of therapeutic exercises, with recommendations at the end of the course for continuation in the form of independent studies using the proven methodology. The duration of the course of therapeutic exercises (in the form of procedures with a physical therapy instructor and subsequent independent studies) was 30 days. Patients in group 2 were divided into three subgroups: subgroup 2A, in which PH procedures were combined with massage of the cervical-collar area and the upper limb area of the affected side; subgroup 2B, where PH gymnastics was carried out in combination with extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) procedures; subgroup 2C - a comprehensive program including LH procedures, manual massage and shock wave therapy. RESULTS: 3 months after the end of the course of rehabilitation measures, patients of all groups showed a significant improvement in scores on the ASES and VAS scales, but there were no reliably significant differences between the results of different groups. CONCLUSION: The study indicates that movement therapy is an effective method of rehabilitation for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome, and conducting complex programs in which PH is combined with other rehabilitation methods (massage, shock wave therapy) doesn't have statistically significant advantages over PH alone within a 3-month observation period.

[Kinesio Taping combined with electroacupuncture for the treatment of Bigliani typeâ subacromial impingement syndrome].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical effect of Kinesio Taping combined with electroacupuncture in the treatment of Bigliani typeⅠsubacromial impingement syndrome. METHODS: From January 2019 to June 2021, 82 cases with Bigliani typeⅠsubacromial impingement syndrome were selected and divided into treatment group and control group. Treatment group included 41 cases, 23 males and 18 females, aged from 20 to 52 years old, with an average of (39.31±5.80)years old. There were 12 cases on left shoulder and 29 cases on right shoulder. The course of disease was from 3.2 to 35.4 months. The treatment group was treated with Kinesio Taping and electroacupuncture. In control group, there were 41 cases, including 22 males and 19 females, aged from 19 to 53 years old with an average of (40.67±6.13) years old, 30 cases on right shoulder, 11 cases on left shoulder. The courses of disease was from 3.0 to 36.0 months. The control group was treated with simple shoulder electroacupuncture. Patients in both groups were treated with electroacupuncture 3 times a week for 3 weeks. After each electroacupuncture treatment in the treatment group, the Kinesio Taping was applied immediately and kept for 2 days. Before treatment, immediately after treatment, and after 1, 3, 8 weeks, the shoulder joint Constant-Murley score, pain visual analogue scale (VAS), and shoulder joint range of motion were used to evaluate the treatment effect. RESULTS: After 1 week of treatment, there was 1 patient in treatment group refused treatment due to hypersensitivity to Kinesio Taping, 1 patient in control group was allergic to the metal needle and refused treatment. And the other 80 patients completed all treatment. Immediately after treatment, and 1, 3, and 8 weeks after treatment, VAS of treatment group were (2.06±1.03), (2.74±1.66), (3.28±1.04), and (3.90±0.12) points, respectively. The Constant-Murley scores of shoulder joint were(86.41±3.52), (82.44±3.14), (80.46±2.54), (76.97±2.01) points. VAS of control group were(3.35±0.41), (3.08±0.92), (3.77±0.67), (3.96±1.04) points, and the Constant-Murley scores of the shoulder joint were(75.82±2.73), (74.72±1.53), (73.66±1.53), (70.68±1.95) points respectively. Immediately after treatment, VAS, Constant-Murley score, and shoulder range of motion between two groups were better than those of before treatment (P<0.05), and the difference was statistically significant between two groups after treatment (P<0.05). One week after treatment, VAS, Constant-Murley score, and shoulder joint range of motion between two groups were better than those of before treatment (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in VAS between two groups (P>0.05). There were significant differences in the Constant-Murley score and shoulder range of motion between two groups (P<0.05). At 3 and 8 weeks after treatment, VAS, Constant-Murley score, and the range of motion of shoulder joints between two groups were better than those of before treatment (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between two groups(P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The treatment for bigliani typeⅠsubacromial impingement syndrome with Kinesio Taping combined with electroacupuncture can reduce pain, effectively improve the function of shoulder joint. In addition, with Kinesio Taping protection when motion, the patients sports ability can be improved obviously, with good immediate effect, and no trauma. If the patients are willing to accept it, it would be an immediate and effective treatment.

Handgrip Strength Exercises Modulate Shoulder Pain, Function, and Strength of Rotator Cuff Muscles of Patients with Primary Subacromial Impingement Syndrome.

Background: Impingement syndrome was shown to be associated with shoulder pain in 44-70% of patients worldwide. It usually occurs due to imbalance and insufficient activation of the rotator cuff (RC) muscles. Aim: This study explores the relative effects of handgrip-strengthening exercises on shoulder function, pain, strength, and active range of motion as part of the treatment program for the patients with primary subacromial impingement syndrome. Materials and Methods: A total of 58 patients aged 18-50 years with primary subacromial impingement syndrome were randomly enrolled to participate in this single-blind randomized clinical trial. Out of them, only forty patients have eligibly matched the inclusion criteria and randomly assigned to one of two groups to undergo a standardized therapeutic program consisting of two sessions a week for 8 weeks. The control group prescribed ultrasound therapy, ice, and stretching exercises, while the experimental group followed the same program with the addition of handgrip-strengthening exercises (HGSE). Both patients of conventional therapy (control) and handgrip-strengthening exercises (experimental group) were advised to adhere also to stretching and HGSE exercises once a day at home for eight weeks. The outcomes were the shoulder function, pain intensity, muscle strength, and active range of motion of the shoulder joint. Results: Patients treated with conventional interventions plus handgrip-strengthening exercises showed the significant improvement over time in shoulder pain and function, strength of rotator cuff muscles, and pain-free range of motion forward flexion, abduction, and external and internal rotation through eight weeks in the experimental group compared to control patient group treated with conventional interventions. In addition, patients of both control and experimental groups showed no significant difference in the adherence to respective home-based stretching and HGSE exercises once a day at home for eight weeks. Conclusions: Adding handgrip-strengthening exercises to conventional intervention increases the efficacy of treatment for patients with primary subacromial impingement syndrome in terms of shoulder function, pain, muscle strength, and active range of motion.

Effects of a Novel Proprioceptive Rehabilitation Device on Shoulder Joint Position Sense, Pain and Function.

Background and Objectives: Shoulder disorders are associated with pain, restricted range of motion and muscular strength, moderate disability and diminished proprioception. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of an innovative technology-supported and a classical therapist-based proprioceptive training program in addition to conventional physiotherapy, on joint position sense (JPS), pain and function, in individuals with different musculoskeletal shoulder disorders, such as rotator cuff tear, subacromial impingement syndrome and superior labrum anterior and posterior tear. The innovative element of the proprioceptive training programme consists of the use of the Kinesimeter, a device created for both training and assessing shoulder JPS. Materials and Methods: The shoulder JPS test and the DASH outcome questionnaire were applied to fifty-five individuals (28 females, 27 males, mean age 56.31 ± 6.75), divided into three groups: 17 in the conventional physiotherapy group (control group); 19 in the conventional physiotherapy + classical proprioceptive training program group (CPT group); and 19 in the conventional physiotherapy + innovative proprioceptive training program group (KPT group). Assessments were performed before and after a four-week rehabilitation program, with five physiotherapy sessions per week. Results: When baseline and post-intervention results were compared, the value of the shoulder JPS and DASH outcome questionnaire improved significantly for the KPT and CPT groups (all p < 0.001). Both KPT and CPT groups showed statistically significant improvements in JPS, pain and function, compared to the control group which received no proprioceptive training (all p < 0.05). However, the KPT group showed no significant benefits compared to the CPT group. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that using the Kinesimeter device as a novel, innovative proprioceptive training tool has similar effects as the classical proprioceptive training programs among individuals with different non-operated musculoskeletal shoulder disorders such as: rotator cuff tear, subacromial impingement syndrome, and superior labrum anterior and posterior tear.

A Mobile Health Application to Enhance Self-Management Skills of Patients with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome During Rehabilitation.

Especially in chronic diseases, such as shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS), good self-management is important for patients to take personal responsibility for their treatment and make informed decisions in rehabilitation processes. Mobile apps integrating game design elements have great potential to increase patients self-management skills. A total of 21 functionalities for a self-management app were derived from semi-structured interviews with six patients and three therapists. Thereby, welcome messages, a personalized home-screen, and training plans are rated as particular useful. Ten of these functionalities could be implemented in a first prototype of SISco: your shoulder impingement syndrome companion. SISco provides possibilities for creating and executing training programs, learning about SIS, checking daily challenges, and making diary entries. Thereby, SISco motivates patients via progress bars, collecting XP, unlocking content and Dr. SISco the virtual therapist. Future work includes the implementation of further functionalities and the evaluation of SISco for usability and user acceptance.

Comparison of the effectiveness of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation exercises and shoulder mobilization patients with Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: A randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) exercises and shoulder mobilization (SM) in addition to conventional physiotherapy on pain, range of motion (ROM), functionality, and muscle strength in patients with Subacromial Impingement Syndrome (SIS). METHODS: Forty-four patients were randomly allocated into three groups as conventional physiotherapy (control group; n = 14), conventional physiotherapy + PNF exercises (PNF group; n = 15), and conventional physiotherapy + SM techniques (SM group; n = 15). Pain, ROM, muscle strength, and functionality were evaluated by using VAS (Visual Analog Scale), goniometer, push-pull dynamometer, Constant-Murley score and DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score. Patients were received 20 sessions (4 weeks) of treatment. Assessments were performed at baseline, and weeks two, four, and sixteen. RESULTS: After treatment, significant improvements in outcome measurements were observed in all groups (all p < 0.05). PNF or SM groups were not superior to each other in terms of improving pain and functionality. SM group was superior to PNF group for improving shoulder flexion ROM at week 4 (p = 0.009). The improvements in shoulder extension muscle strength were greater in PNF group at weeks 2 and 16 compared with other groups (p = 0.030, 0.035). CONCLUSION: PNF or SM, in addition to conventional physiotherapy, might help to improve pain and functionality more in patients with SIS. It is recommended to add SM or PNF to conventional treatment to maintain the ROM increase gained with SIS treatment after treatment, and to apply this treatment for 4 weeks for muscle strength increase.

Thoracic Manual Therapy Improves Pain and Disability in Individuals With Shoulder Impingement Syndrome Compared With Placebo: A Randomized Controlled Trial With 1-Year Follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether muscle energy technique (MET) to the thoracic spine decreases the pain and disability associated with shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS). DESIGN: Single-center, 3-arm, randomized controlled trial, single-blind, placebo control with concealed allocation and a 12-month follow-up. SETTING: Private osteopathic practice. PARTICIPANTS: Three groups of 25 participants (N=75) 40 years or older with SIS received allocated intervention once a week for 15 minutes, 4 consecutive weeks. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly allocated to MET to the thoracic spine (MET-only), MET plus soft tissue massage (MET+STM), or placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) questionnaire; visual analog scale (VAS) (mm/100): current, 7-day average, and 4-week average; Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS); and Global Rating of Change (GROC). Measures recorded at baseline, discharge, 4-week follow-up, 6 months, and 12 months. Also baseline and discharge thoracic posture and range of motion (ROM) measured using an inclinometer. Statistical analysis included mixed-effects linear regression model for DASH, SPADI, VAS, PSFS, GROC, and thoracic posture and ROM. RESULTS: MET-only group demonstrated significantly greater improvement in pain and disability (DASH, SPADI, VAS 7-day average) than placebo at discharge (mean difference, DASH=-8.4; 95% CI, -14.0 to -2.8; SPADI=-14.7; 95% CI, -23.0 to -6.3; VAS=-15.5; 95% CI, -24.5 to -6.5), 6 months (-11.1; 95% CI, -18.6 to -3.7; -14.9; 95% CI, -26.3 to -3.5; -14.1; 95% CI, -26.0 to -2.2), and 12 months (-13.4; 95% CI, -23.9 to-2.9; -19.0; 95% CI, -32.4 to -5.7; -17.3; 95% CI, -30.9 to -3.8). MET+STM group also demonstrated greater improvement in disability but not pain compared with placebo at discharge (DASH=-8.2; 95% CI, -14.0 to -2.3; SPADI=-13.5; 95% CI, -22.3 to -4.8) and 6 months (-9.0; 95% CI, -16.9 to -1.2; -12.4; 95% CI, -24.3 to -0.5). For the PSFS, MET-only group improved compared with placebo at discharge (1.3; 95% CI, 0.1-2.5) and 12 months (1.8; 95% CI, 0.5-3.2); MET+STM at 12 months (1.7; 95% CI, 0.3-3.0). GROC: MET-only group improved compared with placebo at discharge (1.5; 95% CI, 0.9-2.2) and 4 weeks (1.0; 95% CI, 0.1-1.9); MET+STM at discharge (1.2; 95% CI, 0.5-1.9) and 6 months (1.2; 95% CI, 0.1-1.3). There were no differences between MET-only group and MET+STM, and no between-group differences in thoracic posture or ROM. CONCLUSIONS: MET of the thoracic spine with or without STM improved the pain and disability in individuals 40 years or older with SIS and may be recommended as a treatment approach for SIS.